Reinterpreting the Constitution
How the Supreme Court Changes the Law
Seiten
2023
Lexington Books/Fortress Academic (Verlag)
978-1-6669-3830-2 (ISBN)
Lexington Books/Fortress Academic (Verlag)
978-1-6669-3830-2 (ISBN)
The core theme of this book is that the justices, both liberal and conservative, do not simply call balls and strikes, as Chief Justice Roberts memorably stated, in formulating their decisions. Instead, as shown in some 200 cases, they have expanded or limited prior precedent, created new rights, and eliminated others.
In the Senate Confirmation Hearings on his nomination, Chief Justice John Roberts memorably stated that he believed that the proper role of judges is "to call balls and strikes," an analogy repeated by Justice Kavanaugh in his hearings. This book makes clear, however, that the justices have often changed the strike zone. They have overruled past precedent, significantly expanded or limited prior rulings, created new constitutional rights such as that protecting same-sex marriage, while striking down constitutional rights recognized for many years, including a woman's right to choose an abortion. The book carefully reviews some 200 cases, highlighting what the justices themselves have said in explaining their rulings. It also notes how the dissenting opinions are particularly valuable in explaining the dissenters' often accurate contentions that some decisions significantly changed prior precedent. The book begins with cases decided in the 19th and 20th centuries to give the background of the constitutional issues discussed, but the overall focus is on 21st-century decisions since they have accelerated changes in constitutional law.
In the Senate Confirmation Hearings on his nomination, Chief Justice John Roberts memorably stated that he believed that the proper role of judges is "to call balls and strikes," an analogy repeated by Justice Kavanaugh in his hearings. This book makes clear, however, that the justices have often changed the strike zone. They have overruled past precedent, significantly expanded or limited prior rulings, created new constitutional rights such as that protecting same-sex marriage, while striking down constitutional rights recognized for many years, including a woman's right to choose an abortion. The book carefully reviews some 200 cases, highlighting what the justices themselves have said in explaining their rulings. It also notes how the dissenting opinions are particularly valuable in explaining the dissenters' often accurate contentions that some decisions significantly changed prior precedent. The book begins with cases decided in the 19th and 20th centuries to give the background of the constitutional issues discussed, but the overall focus is on 21st-century decisions since they have accelerated changes in constitutional law.
Edward F. Mannino is lawyer and historian.
Introduction
Chapter 1: Free Speech
Chapter 2: Free Exercise of Religion
Chapter 3: Establishment of Religion
Chapter 4: Unlawful Searches and Seizures
Chapter 5: Race
Chapter 6: The Right to Bear Arms
Chapter 7: Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Chapter 8: Property Rights
Chapter 9: The Commerce Clause and the Taxing Power
Chapter 10: Same-Sex Marriage
Chapter 11: Abortion
Chapter 12: Limiting Immigration
Conclusion: Whither Goes the Court?
| Erscheinungsdatum | 25.05.2023 |
|---|---|
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 161 x 236 mm |
| Gewicht | 599 g |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| Recht / Steuern ► Öffentliches Recht | |
| Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung ► Staat / Verwaltung | |
| ISBN-10 | 1-6669-3830-0 / 1666938300 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-1-6669-3830-2 / 9781666938302 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Organisationen steuern, Strukturen schaffen, Prozesse gestalten
Buch | Softcover (2024)
Rehm Verlag
CHF 53,20
