The europe code (eBook)

Global politics and the positioning of europe

J-G MATUSZEK (Autor)

eBook Download: EPUB

2024 | 1. Auflage
408 Seiten
Books on Demand (Verlag)
978-3-7597-4128-8 (ISBN)

Infos

who feels addressed Conclusion from the book POLITICS @ GLOBAL-WORLD Discover the future of international politics! A paradigm shift is taking place, opening up new paths and innovative solutions to global challenges. Hope for global oriented politics grows, while world clusters are emerging that jointly determine the course of world politics. Europe is consolidating its role on the global stage as a leading player in diplomacy and climate protection. Guidelines for excellence in politics set new standards for ethical and effective governance. Be there when creativity shapes new developments and redesigns world politics!

J-G Matuszek Universities: Innsbruck, Perugia, Salzburg. Language sciences. Graduate interpreter, Master's degree. Political sciences, Empirical system sciences, International relations, Communication sciences, Philosophy, Doctorate. Postgraduate studies at various institutes: Marketing, Advertising-PR-CI, Management-Controlling, Innovation and Development Management. Licensed consultant. Career: High school teacher, translator and interpreter, journalism. Manager at multinational corporations. Management contracting in medium-sized companies. Consulting and coaching in marketing, international management, and HR. Board member and director in several companies in Germany, Switzerland. Management in the field of certification of companies and organizations. Board member of the Foundation "Globility-Circle", Switzerland. Guest lecturer at various universities and business schools. Author. Parallel-career as athlete, Austrian Taekwondo Federation President, High-tech collaborations for performance diagnostics/optimization in business and sports.

Textauszug

B. HOPE FOR GLOBAL-ORIENTED POLITICS

Hope is an essential aspect of political considerations, particularly in the context of overlapping crises such as concurrent climate change, economic inequality and threats to democracy. Hope is an essential part of global politics because it inspires action and experimentation for a better future. Political hope must be distinguished from fear. The responsibility and the pursuit of a more democratic society must be recognized at an early stage.

Historically, fear-based politics have always encouraged nationalist thinking. Fear is a powerful tool for political reactionaries, while hope inspires rational political action. Narratives of hope shape the structure and direction of positive politics. These requirements cannot be effectively addressed by any single country alone. As awareness of these issues grows, there is increasing pressure on policymakers to prioritize international cooperation and find solutions that benefit more and more countries.

The Global South and Global North can indeed be pitted against each other, particularly in areas such as trade, finance and geopolitics. In trade, many argue that the North exploits the South by sourcing cheap raw materials and labor and exporting expensive products. The South is trying to take collective countermeasures in order to achieve fairer trade relations. Major powers such as China, Russia and India are expanding their presence in the global south to gain economic and political influence. They provide financial support, infrastructure and trade opportunities to developing countries to pursue their own interests and limit Western influence. When it comes to climate policy, some countries in the South argue that the North has historically contributed more to climate change and should therefore bear more responsibility. They demand financial aid and technology transfer, which leads to tensions.

However, there are also many common interests between North and South, such as fighting poverty, terrorism or pandemics. Many countries are working together on these issues. Nevertheless, it is important to be aware of the dynamics of playing off one another and to look for ways in which the Global South can better represent its interests and help shape a fairer global order. When it comes to global partnerships, collaboration for mutual benefit must be prioritized. This happens when partnerships are equal and sustainable. With a view to protecting the multipolar order, the diversity of perspectives and interests in the global community must be respected.

In communication, the dialogue with global partners has to be transparent and open. The exchange of information promotes the search for common ground with common goals. There are also cases in which it could be necessary to forego certain privileges or advantages in order to consolidate greater cooperation and solidarity in the global community. This may mean making sacrifices for the greater good.

International politics must continually address the existential questions of systems that are intended to continually develop security aspects. It is therefore necessary that the international community has mechanisms in place to regularly review existing security guarantees and adapt them to the circumstances. This includes various tools that focus on addressing global problems. Classical theories emphasize the role of the state as key actor in international politics. They regard states as homogeneous units with specific interests. However, this perspective is seen as too narrow and no longer appropriate for the realities of the 21st century.

Liberal theories assume that people, as rational decision-makers, can create the long-term conditions for the successful pursuit of interests in changed structures. They presuppose that people are prepared to relate their own claim to freedom to the claim to freedom of all other people. However, these approaches are often criticized for not sufficiently taking into account the structural conditions, that limit the ability of individuals and groups to act. Institutional approaches focus on the role of institutions and collaboration working together to solve global problems. They emphasize the importance of transnational cooperation and the ability of international and regional institutions to take on tasks, that states alone can no longer manage. Structuralist approaches assume that the relationships within a system determine the actors' ability to act. They emphasize the role of power and conflicts of interest in shaping international politics.

It has always been the case that there have always been negative elements in world politics. Nevertheless there was again and again the strength to fight back. This requires persistence and commitment to global cooperation, especially today. International relations are often characterized by negative power, uncertainty and conflicts of interest, even if this does not always correspond to normative ideals. What you don't want to believe is often a bitter reality. Realistic theories assume, that states primarily strive to maintain and expand power, even if this may be morally questionable. Human rights and democracy are often sacrificed for „realpolitik“. Without mandated authority, states find themselves in a constant struggle for security and influence. Cooperation is difficult and conflict is common. Despite the proliferation of international law and institutions, the disorder in international relations has often increased. States, not nations, remain the most powerful actors. Given the complexity of world politics, no theory can predict or explain all phenomena.

In a world where communication increasingly takes place via social media and digital platforms, the value of face-to-face communication should not be lost sight of. Direct, face-to-face communication provides greater clarity and understanding in conversations and helps build stronger connections. Staying informed, always seeking new experiences and evaluating direct communication accordingly means a more hopeful future for everyone. It is everyone's right to learn about policies instead of relying solely on biased sources or social media. Critically analyzing different perspectives and searching for credible sources ensures an informed opinion. It is the first step towards a meaningful political discussion.

Additionally, it is every individual’s right to educate themselves about policies rather than relying solely on biased sources. The public has a right to transparency in international politics. Even if evaluation is often suppressed in the environment of large organizations, the feedback from civil society brings its demands to the surface. Evaluation can no longer be abolished or suppressed. Critically analyzing different perspectives and searching for credible sources ensures an informed opinion. This is a big step towards a meaningful political discussion.

The fact base always refers to objective information, supported by studies and research. When politicians make decisions based primarily on emotions and personal beliefs rather than objective facts, they end up in a mess of ideological thinking. Make no mistake, the emotional aspect is even present in science. The evaluation process itself is also subject to strict control aspects. Reliability is not only an empirical postulate, but also a moral responsibility that applies to everyone.

The sources of the professional investigations highlight the complexities within global political dynamics, such as the shift from existential concerns to geopolitical rivalries, the clash of world powers and the emergence of unconventional leadership styles. In evaluation, more and more attention is paid to what happens between the lines, where anger, annoyance, envy, indignation, hostility and irrationality are additionally hidden. The uncertain knowledge about the settings disrupts the planned interactions externally. The competitiveness of performance is increasingly coming to the fore. That’s why it’s important to accurately recognize the power potential and dynamics. Without a rating, the scope of interpretation becomes narrow. The process of evaluation itself is also subject to strict aspects of control. Reliability is not only an empirical postulate, but also a moral responsibility that applies to all.

In politics there are tipping points, similar to those in natural sciences, which are irreversible, at least for the moment. Once such point has been reached, it can be difficult or impossible to reverse the changes that have been set in motion. The aim must therefore be to avoid reaching such tipping points at all. Of course, it would be best to take precautions and not let things get to that point - society needs to be warned early in order to adapt to situations that are unwanted.

Effective communication, transparency and collaboration are essential in providing early warnings and ensuring that the public is aware of potential risks. By fostering a culture of resilience and preparedness, leaders can help empower individuals and communities to take proactive steps to mitigate risks and adapt to changing circumstances. Risk factors for society include political carelessness and negligence. That’s why it is important for political leaders to carefully consider their decisions and actions, as they can have far-reaching consequences that are difficult to reverse. Wrong decisions exacerbate humanitarian crises, particularly if they fuel conflict or limit support for vulnerable populations. Public perception plays a role when negative decisions are discussed in the media and cause lasting damage to the...

Produkt-Details

• Erscheint lt. Verlag: 13.9.2024
• Sprache: englisch
• Themenwelt: Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung
• ISBN-10: 3-7597-4128-2 / 3759741282
• ISBN-13: 978-3-7597-4128-8 / 9783759741288