The Political Thought of Justice Antonin Scalia
A Hamiltonian on the Supreme Court
Seiten
2006
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (Verlag)
978-0-7425-4310-2 (ISBN)
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (Verlag)
978-0-7425-4310-2 (ISBN)
- Titel ist leider vergriffen;
keine Neuauflage - Artikel merken
Explores the similarities in political and constitutional thought between Justice Antonin Scalia and Alexander Hamilton, and views that Hamilton holds the key to understanding Justice Scalia's decisions. This title uses comparisons between the two men to find the underlying judicial philosophy that connects Justice Scalia's manifold decisions.
The Political Thought of Antonin Scalia: A Hamiltonian on the Supreme Court traces Justice Antonin Scalia's jurisprudence back to the political and constitutional thought of Alexander Hamilton. Not only is there substantial agreement between these two men in the areas of constitutional interpretation, federalism, separation of powers, executive and judicial power, but the two men also have similar temperaments: bold, decisive, and principled. By examining the congruence in thought between Hamilton and Scalia, it is hoped that a better and deeper understanding of Justice Scalia's jurisprudence will be achieved. While an abundance of scholarship has been written on Justice Scalia, no one has systematically examined his political philosophy. This book also draws out the important differences between Justice Scalia's jurisprudence and that of the other conservative members of the Court—the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas.
The Political Thought of Antonin Scalia: A Hamiltonian on the Supreme Court traces Justice Antonin Scalia's jurisprudence back to the political and constitutional thought of Alexander Hamilton. Not only is there substantial agreement between these two men in the areas of constitutional interpretation, federalism, separation of powers, executive and judicial power, but the two men also have similar temperaments: bold, decisive, and principled. By examining the congruence in thought between Hamilton and Scalia, it is hoped that a better and deeper understanding of Justice Scalia's jurisprudence will be achieved. While an abundance of scholarship has been written on Justice Scalia, no one has systematically examined his political philosophy. This book also draws out the important differences between Justice Scalia's jurisprudence and that of the other conservative members of the Court—the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas.
James B. Staab is a professor of political science at the University of Central Missouri.
Chapter 0 Introduction: Scalia's Distinctive Brand of Conservatism Chapter 1. Nothing Is Easy: The Road to the Supreme Court Chapter 2. Separation of Powers and Access to Justice Chapter 3. Interbranch Conflicts Between Congress and the President Chapter 4. Executive Power Chapter 5. The "Politics" of Administration Chapter 6. The Conservative Role of Judges in a Democratic System of Government Chapter 7. The "Science" of Interpreting Texts Chapter 8. Early Hamiltonian Leanings in the Area of Federalism Chapter 9. The Transformation from a Hamiltonian to a Madisonian in Federalism Disputes Chapter 10 Conclusion: Scalia's Personality and Statesmanship
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 4.5.2006 |
|---|---|
| Verlagsort | Lanham, MD |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 157 x 238 mm |
| Gewicht | 626 g |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung ► Politische Theorie | |
| ISBN-10 | 0-7425-4310-2 / 0742543102 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0-7425-4310-2 / 9780742543102 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Der »progressive« Angriff auf Israel, Judentum und …
Buch | Softcover (2024)
edition TIAMAT (Verlag)
CHF 39,20
ein Vortrag
Buch | Softcover (2024)
Suhrkamp (Verlag)
CHF 13,95
