Nicht aus der Schweiz? Besuchen Sie lehmanns.de
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness - Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Buch | Softcover
231 Seiten
2011
Springer (Verlag)
978-94-007-2601-7 (ISBN)
CHF 194,70 inkl. MwSt
  • Versand in 10-15 Tagen
  • Versandkostenfrei
  • Auch auf Rechnung
  • Artikel merken
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.

Theoretical Background and Organization of the Study.- Considerations Regarding the Design of the Study.- Ad Hominem Fallacies: An Exemplary Study.- The Confrontation Stage: The Freedom Rule.- The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend Rule (I).- The Opening Stage: The Obligation-to-Defend (II).- The Argumentation Stage: The Argument Scheme Rule.- The Concluding Stage: The Concluding Rule.- Conventional Validity of the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.

Erscheint lt. Verlag 29.11.2011
Reihe/Serie Argumentation Library ; 16
Zusatzinfo X, 231 p.
Verlagsort Dordrecht
Sprache englisch
Maße 155 x 235 mm
Themenwelt Schulbuch / Wörterbuch Lexikon / Chroniken
Schulbuch / Wörterbuch Wörterbuch / Fremdsprachen
Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Logik
Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Sprachphilosophie
Geisteswissenschaften Sprach- / Literaturwissenschaft Sprachwissenschaft
ISBN-10 94-007-2601-5 / 9400726015
ISBN-13 978-94-007-2601-7 / 9789400726017
Zustand Neuware
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich

von Sandra Markewitz; Ansgar Lorenz

Buch | Softcover (2024)
Brill | Fink (Verlag)
CHF 27,85
ein Gegenentwurf zum kurzfristigen Denken : so werden wir zu den …

von Ari Wallach

Buch | Hardcover (2023)
REDLINE (Verlag)
CHF 27,90
eine logische Untersuchung

von Gottlob Frege; Uwe Voigt

Buch | Softcover (2024)
Phillip Reclam (Verlag)
CHF 7,25