Art of Playing Defense (eBook)

How to Get Ahead by Not Falling Behind

Whitney Tilson (Autor)

eBook Download: EPUB

2021 | 1. Auflage
234 Seiten
Lioncrest Publishing (Verlag)
978-1-5445-2030-8 (ISBN)

Infos

To be successful and enjoy a happy life, it's important to do all the right things: become well educated and wise, develop a strong work ethic, always act with integrity, and treat others well. But what's equally important-yet widely overlooked-is avoiding the calamities that cause you to suffer, go back to square one, or worst of all, die a premature death. Famed investor Whitney Tilson has made a living managing risks with investments. Now, he turns his attention to the risks in our everyday lives. The Art of Playing Defense is a practical and actionable guide filled with common sense ideas for avoiding life's calamities, such as marrying the wrong person or having a good marriage go bad, getting thrown in jail, going bankrupt, or suffering a debilitating illness or injury. With Whitney's help, you can avoid these disastrous outcomes. It's no fun thinking about all the things that can go wrong in life, but if you want to get ahead, you have to start by not falling behind.

Textauszug

Calamity #1

1. Loss of Reputation and/or Wealth

If you’re in the professional world—if you are, for example, a doctor, lawyer, or businessperson—your greatest asset other than your brain is your reputation, for how hard you work, your sense of decency, and most importantly, your integrity.

Cherish and protect it because, as Buffett once said:

“It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you’ll do things differently.

I want employees to ask themselves whether they are willing to have any contemplated act appear the next day on the front of their local paper, to be read by their spouses, children, and friends, with the reporting done by an informed and critical reporter.”

You need to be especially careful of your reputation if you’re a public figure, on whom the scrutiny is greater. I am extremely sensitive to this danger because I send an investing-related email to more than 125,000 people every weekday, an education-related one to 7,500 folks every week or two, a coronavirus-related one to more than 5,000 people every week, and a few every day to 250-1,000 recipients on various subjects, ranging from politics to adventure sports to what my family and I are up to. In addition, I regularly speak on live television, at conferences, and to reporters.

Thus, multiple times a day, I run the risk that I will write or say something off the cuff that goes viral and ruins my reputation. I’ve made some small mistakes that have really scared me.

Right out of college, as I was helping Wendy Kopp launch Teach for America, I was interviewed by a reporter for the Harvard Crimson. In making a point about teacher shortages in low-income communities, I said, “Many school districts just need warm bodies.”

This crude and foolish comment was, of course, featured prominently in the article.

Wendy was so mad at me—deservedly so—that she never let me speak to the media again.

Years later, I sent an email to my school-reform email list in which I commented on the then-Mayor of Newark, New Jersey, Sharpe James, who was facing corruption charges. Being certain of his guilt (he was later convicted and served time in prison), I sent around an article about his indictment with the comment, “Hang him high!”

A few minutes later, someone emailed me back saying, “Whitney, did you really mean to use language related to lynching when referring to a black man?”

Of course not! I was horrified by what I’d written and immediately sent an apologetic follow-up email.

Another time, I was on Bloomberg TV talking about Taser, a stock I was betting against (it’s since been renamed Axon). In explaining why I said that the company had no patents or valuable intellectual property.

About a week later, I received an email from Taser’s law firm saying I had defamed the company because it did, in fact, hold numerous patents and demanded a retraction.

I had screwed up again. By not being careful with my words, I had exposed myself to substantial legal costs at the very least.

Fortunately, I was able to resolve the issue by replying with a letter apologizing for my mistake, pledging never to speak publicly about the stock again, and pointing out that if they forced me to publicly issue a retraction, it would only draw attention to an otherwise obscure interview that almost no one had seen. I never heard from them again, so it ended up being a low-cost lesson early in my career to be very careful when publicly criticizing a company.

Almost every day, I see a public figure in trouble for something they said or wrote (usually an off-the-cuff remark).

I don’t want this to happen to me, so now I proofread every mass email before I send it and always try to be well-prepared when I speak on television, in front of an audience, or to a reporter.

Another way to ruin your reputation is to do something unethical or illegal (which can lead to a loss of freedom—i.e., going to prison).

Consider the fate of David Sokol, a former top executive at Berkshire Hathaway who was once rumored to be Buffett’s successor. He discovered a publicly traded chemical company called Lubrizol that he thought would be a great acquisition candidate for Berkshire Hathaway, so he brought this idea to Buffett, who agreed and eventually acquired the company.

However, inexplicably, Sokol had personally bought Lubrizol stock beforehand, thereby profiting from Berkshire Hathaway’s acquisition. As soon as Buffett found out what Sokol had done, he had no choice but to immediately fire him and report what had happened to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC ultimately took no action, but it didn’t matter—Sokol’s reputation was destroyed, and his career was over, all for an insignificant profit. For a single moment, he let greed overshadow his integrity, and he was ruined.

It’s critical to be disciplined and thoughtful about ethical gray areas and never engage in borderline (much less illegal) behavior. It’s simple in concept but can be tricky in practice, and there’s no room for error. One mistake can ruin your life.

Over the nearly two decades that I ran a hedge fund, there were so many opportunities to break the law and/or ruin my reputation. Most of these situations were pretty clear, but some weren’t.

For example, what if I talk to the CEO of a small company, and I suspect (but am not sure) he might have given me material nonpublic information? Or if I talk to a reporter who I think (but am not sure) is writing an article that might cause a stock to move sharply? Or if I’m preparing an in-depth presentation of a stock idea at a major conference that I think (but am not sure) could move the stock materially?

Can I trade these stocks? To this day, I don’t know the answer. So I just didn’t.

Here’s an example related to the stock for which I’m perhaps best known, Lumber Liquidators. I bet against the stock and pitched it at the Robin Hood Investors Conference in late 2013. Then, in early 2014, I heard from someone in the industry that the company was sourcing and selling Chinese-made laminate flooring tainted with formaldehyde, a health hazard and clear violation of US environmental regulations. Once I’d tested the product and verified my source’s story, I wanted to bring attention to what this company was doing, both to protect American consumers and because I thought it might crush the stock (and therefore benefit my short position).

“Who better,” I thought, “than 60 Minutes to break this story?” So I contacted a producer I knew there and, to make a long story short, they agreed it was an important story and started working on it.

At that point, I didn’t know for sure if 60 Minutes was going to run the story, what it would say, or when it might air. But by December 2014, when Anderson Cooper interviewed me at length, I was pretty sure that they were going to do a major story that could devastate the stock (which is exactly what happened in March 2015), so I could have made millions of dollars had I further increased my short position.

But I didn’t. I worried that the knowledge I had about 60 Minutes working on the story constituted inside information. To this day, I’m not sure if it did, but I didn’t want to find out the hard way, and, to me, it didn’t pass the front-page-of-the-newspaper test. So I didn’t trade the stock at all until after the story aired.

I can’t emphasize strongly enough that no amount of money is worth jeopardizing your reputation.

Your Worst 1%

It’s important to understand that you aren’t judged for the way you behave 90% or even 95% of the time, but rather on your worst 1%—or even 0.01%.

To my knowledge, David Sokol had never done anything unethical in his long career before his fateful purchase of Lubrizol’s stock ruined him. That’s all it took.

In my two decades as a hedge fund manager, I made thousands of trades. To my knowledge, all were ethical and proper, but if even one hadn’t been, I could have been ruined as well.

One misjudgment is all it takes, so avoid gray areas. Never go near the line. Be ultraconservative when it comes to your integrity and reputation.

This applies to every area of life. You can be a kind and generous person almost all of the time, but if you make one blatantly racist or sexist remark (even if you’re not racist or sexist), that’s what you will be remembered for.

Even if you’ve been faithful to your spouse for decades, if you go to Vegas one weekend, get drunk, and have a one-night stand, you’ve likely permanently ruined your...

Produkt-Details

• Erscheint lt. Verlag: 18.5.2021
• Sprache: englisch
• Themenwelt: Sachbuch/Ratgeber ► Gesundheit / Leben / Psychologie ► Lebenshilfe / Lebensführung
• ISBN-10: 1-5445-2030-1 / 1544520301
• ISBN-13: 978-1-5445-2030-8 / 9781544520308