Executive Decision-Making and the Courts

Revisiting the Origins of Modern Judicial Review

TT Arvind, Richard Kirkham, Daithí Mac Síthigh, Lindsay Stirton (Herausgeber)

Buch | Softcover

576 Seiten

2022
Hart Publishing (Verlag)
978-1-5099-4477-4 (ISBN)

Artikel merken

In this book, leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of four seminal House of Lords judgments decided in the 1960s: Ridge v Baldwin, Padfeld v Minister of Agriculture, Conway v Rimmer, and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission. The ‘Quartet’ is generally acknowledged to have marked a turning point in the development of court-centred administrative law, and can be understood as a 'formative moment' in the emergence of modern judicial review.

These cases are examined not only in terms of the points each case decided, and their contribution to administrative law doctrine, but also in terms of the underlying conception of the tasks of administrative law implicit in the Quartet. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged and the constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the implications of these historical processes for how the achievements, failings and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated.

TT Arvind is Professor of Law at the University of York, UK. Richard Kirkham is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Sheffield, UK. Daithí Mac Síthigh is Professor of Law and Innovation at Queen's University Belfast, UK. Lindsay Stirton is Professor of Public Law at the University of Sussex, UK.

PART I
SETTING THE SCENE
1. Introduction: Judicial Review and the Quartet
TT Arvind, University of York, UK, Richard Kirkham, University of Sheffield, UK, Daithí Mac Síthigh, Queen’s University Belfast, UK and Lindsay Stirton, University of Sussex, UK
2. Lord Reid: The Judge as Law Maker?
Robert Reed, Lord Reed of Allermuir, President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

PART II
THE QUARTET IN CONTEXT
3. Ridge v Baldwin: Executive and Judicial Approaches to Administrative Law Before and During the Quartet Years
Robert Thomas, University of Manchester, UK
4. Judges and Parliamentary Democracy: The Lessons of Padfield v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
Maurice Sunkin, University of Essex, UK
5. Legitimacy and the Courts: The Forgotten Story of Conway v Rimmer
TT Arvind, University of York, UK and Lindsay Stirton, University of Sussex, UK
6. Anisminic in Retrospect
David Feldman, University of Cambridge, UK

PART III
THE LEGACY OF THE QUARTET
7. Plus ça Change? An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Review in Modern Administrative Law
Sarah Nason, Prifysgol Bangor University, UK
8. The Reawakening of Common Law Rights: Are they Still ‘Suitable for the Winning of Freedom in the New Age’?
Paul Bowen QC, Brick Court Chambers, UK
9. Beyond the End of Ouster Clause History?
Joe Tomlinson, University of York, UK

PART IV
THE QUARTET OUTSIDE ENGLAND
10. Administrative Law and the Administrative Court for – or in – Wales
David C Gardner, No5 Barristers’ Chambers, Bristol, UK
11. The Rule of Law against Judicial Review? The Quartet in Scots Administrative Law
Paul F Scott, University of Glasgow, UK
12. The Quartet Plus Two: Judicial Review in Northern Ireland
Gordon Anthony, Queen’s University Belfast, UK

PART V
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE QUARTET
13. Israeli Administrative Law and the Quartet – One Step Ahead
Daphne Barak-Erez, Tel Aviv University, Israel
14. Importation and Indigeneity: The Quartet in New Zealand Administrative Law
Dean R Knight, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
15. The Quartet in the New Commonwealth
Peter Cane, University of Cambridge, UK

PART VI
THE QUARTET IN THEORY, PRACTICE AND HISTORY
16. The Quartet Cases Compared
Stephen Bailey, University of Nottingham, UK
17. ‘Judicial Power’ and Political Power: Reflections in Light of the Quartet
Alexander Latham-Gambi, Swansea University, UK
18. Strategic Judging: Lessons from the Reid Era of Judicial Decision-Making
Richard Kirkham, University of Sheffield, UK and Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, University of York, UK

PART VII
CONCLUSION
19. The Real Argument about Judicial Review
TT Arvind, University of York, UK, Richard Kirkham, University of Sheffield, UK, Daithí Mac Síthigh, Queen’s University Belfast, UK and Lindsay Stirton, University of Sussex, UK

Erscheinungsdatum	25.02.2021
Verlagsort	Oxford
Sprache	englisch
Maße	156 x 234 mm
Themenwelt	Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht
	Recht / Steuern ► Öffentliches Recht
	Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht ► Zivilverfahrensrecht
ISBN-10	1-5099-4477-X / 150994477X
ISBN-13	978-1-5099-4477-4 / 9781509944774
Zustand	Neuware