Democracy, Expertise, and Academic Freedom
A First Amendment Jurisprudence for the Modern State
Seiten
2013
Yale University Press (Verlag)
978-0-300-19249-0 (ISBN)
Yale University Press (Verlag)
978-0-300-19249-0 (ISBN)
- Titel ist leider vergriffen;
keine Neuauflage - Artikel merken
Offers an account of incompleteness of prevailing theories of freedom of speech. This title shows that familiar understanding of First Amendment, which stresses "marketplace of ideas" and which holds that "everyone is entitled to an opinion", is inadequate to create and preserve expert knowledge that is necessary for a modern democracy to thrive.
A leading American legal scholar offers a surprising account of the incompleteness of prevailing theories of freedom of speech. Robert C. Post shows that the familiar understanding of the First Amendment, which stresses the “marketplace of ideas” and which holds that "everyone is entitled to an opinion," is inadequate to create and preserve the expert knowledge that is necessary for a modern democracy to thrive. For a modern society reliably to answer such questions as whether nicotine causes cancer, the free and open exchange of ideas must be complemented by standards of scientific competence and practice that are both hierarchical and judgmental.
Post develops a theory of First Amendment rights that seeks to explain both the need for the free formation of public opinion and the need for the distribution and creation of expertise. Along the way he offers a new and useful account of constitutional doctrines of academic freedom. These doctrines depend both upon free expression and the necessity of the kinds of professional judgment that universities exercise when they grant or deny tenure, or that professional journals exercise when they accept or reject submissions.
A leading American legal scholar offers a surprising account of the incompleteness of prevailing theories of freedom of speech. Robert C. Post shows that the familiar understanding of the First Amendment, which stresses the “marketplace of ideas” and which holds that "everyone is entitled to an opinion," is inadequate to create and preserve the expert knowledge that is necessary for a modern democracy to thrive. For a modern society reliably to answer such questions as whether nicotine causes cancer, the free and open exchange of ideas must be complemented by standards of scientific competence and practice that are both hierarchical and judgmental.
Post develops a theory of First Amendment rights that seeks to explain both the need for the free formation of public opinion and the need for the distribution and creation of expertise. Along the way he offers a new and useful account of constitutional doctrines of academic freedom. These doctrines depend both upon free expression and the necessity of the kinds of professional judgment that universities exercise when they grant or deny tenure, or that professional journals exercise when they accept or reject submissions.
Robert C. Post is Sol & Lillian Goldman Professor of Law and Dean of the Yale Law School.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 14.5.2013 |
|---|---|
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 140 x 210 mm |
| Gewicht | 213 g |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| Recht / Steuern ► Öffentliches Recht ► Verfassungsrecht | |
| ISBN-10 | 0-300-19249-5 / 0300192495 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0-300-19249-0 / 9780300192490 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Buch | Hardcover (2024)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 104,95
