Polymers, Patents, Profits – A Classic Case Study for Patent Infighting
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH (Hersteller)
978-3-527-61040-2 (ISBN)
- Keine Verlagsinformationen verfügbar
- Artikel merken
Any groundbreaking scientific discovery or invention is potentially of general interest and is therefore also the basis for profitable follow up developments and innovations. From the scientist' s point of view it is desirable to save his innovative achievements for his own profit. This why the state grants exclusive rights to the scientist in the form of patents. In turn, the scientist has to disclose the details of the discovery. In the mid 1950s, Nobel prizewinner Karl Ziegler and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute of Carbon Research established a technology that had an outstanding impact on the worldwide production of polypropylenes and polyethylenes, the fundamental components of the plastics industry. This is the fascinating, first hand story of the patent fights between the research team and the "giants" of the petrochemicals industry, such as Du Pont and Esso. The author was part of Ziegler s group throughout the entire period, resulting here in an entertaining case study of an innovative chemical discovery, presenting interesting historical as well as scientific information.
An impressive example of the fights between academia and industry concerning patent rights and the economic utilization of academic research innovations.
Heinz Martin has been a close colleague of Prof. Ziegler at the Max-Planck-Institute of Carbon Research in Muhlheim/Ruhr (Germany) and played an important key role in the invention of Ziegler's Polyolefine catalysts in 1953/54. In 1970 he became Co-director of the Studien- und Verwertungs GmbH (founded in 1925), which became the Studiengesellschaft Kohle GmbH in 1955, a trustee of the MPI in Muhlheim, with H. Martin as director.
1 The Invention.1.1 First Observations 1950/1953.1.1.1 Standard Oil of Indiana.1.1.2 Phillips Petroleum Company.1.1.3 Du Pont.1.1.3.1 From the Beginning up to the Patent Application.1.3.1.2 Only a Scant Experimental "Polypropylene."1.2 Max-Planck-Institute, Mulheim on the Ruhr.1.2.1 K. Ziegler, H. Breil, E. Holzkamp and H. Martin.1.2.2 Experiments between May and December, 1953.1.2.2.1 Montecatini Points to the Contractual Rights and Obligations.1.2.3 Experiments from December 1953 through April 1954.1.2.4 Letter from Ziegler to his Patent Attorney von Kreisler.1.3 Montecatini, Milano/G. Natta and Co-workers.1.3.1 The First Experiments with Ziegler catalysts.1.3.2 Natta, Orsoni and DeVarda's Visit to Ziegler at Mulheim on May 19, 1954.1.4 K. Ziegler and Co-workers.1.4.1 H. Martin: Experiments May-July 6, 1954; H. Breil: Masters Thesis.1.4.2 H. Martin, July 1954: Polypropylene.1.5 1952-1954 Polypropylene (Review).1.5.1 Appraising the Historical Course of the Invention from a Year-2000 Vantage Point.References.2 The Chemical Industry Connection.2.1 Farbwerke Hoechst.2.2 Petrochemicals Limited.2.3 Steinkohlenbergbauverein (Hard Coal Mining Society)/Bergwerksverband (Mine Association)/Ruhr Area Coal Industry.2.4 The "Run" of Prospective US Licensees.2.4.1 Hercules Powder Company.2.4.2 Gulf Oil, Koppers, Dow, Union Carbide and Monsanto.2.4.3 Esso, the Straggler.2.4.4 Du Pont.2.5 Mitsui Chemical, the First Japanese Licensee.2.6 Summary.2.7 Back to the Ruhr: Ruhrcoal and Bergwerksverband.2.8 August through December 1954: Montecatini steps up its own Developments.2.9 The first Ziegler/Montecatini Pool-Agreements.2.10 Polydiene.2.10.1 Karl Ziegler and H. Martin/Max-Planck-Institute for Coal Research; S. E. Horne/Goodrich Gulf Chemicals Inc.; Giulio Natta and Co-Workers/ Montecatini; D.R. Smith and R.P. Zelinski/Phillips Petroleum Co.References.3 Patent Rights Worldwide, Patent Applications: Prosecution, Oppositions, Priority Rights.3.1 The Package of the First Six German Patent Applications.3.2 Foreign Patent Protection for the Inventions of Ziegler and Co-Workers.3.3 The Situation in the United States.3.4 Polypropylene: Ziegler/Natta, Conflict as to the Priority.3.5 Contention Proceedings.3.5.1 Montecatini.3.5.2 Du Pont.3.5.3 Compromise and Concessions.3.5.4 Du Pont Sought Further Advantages.3.6 The History of Patent Issuance from a Year-2000 Vantage Point.References.4 Innovation, Market Development, Production.4.1 The Market Situation.4.2 The Rush for Licenses 1953-1972, Lucrative Second Half 1970-1990.4.3 The Marketing of Ziegler Polyolefins.4.4 Montecatini's Pool Polyolefin Licenses.4.5 Research and Production.4.6 Early "New", So-Called Independent Catalysts.4.6.1 Case 1.4.6.2 Case 2.4.6.3 Case 3.4.6.4 Case 4.4.6.5 Case 5.4.6.6 Case 6.4.6.7 Case 7.4.6.8 Case 8.4.6.9 Case 9.4.6.10 Case 10.4.6.11 Case 11.4.7 The Split between Montecatini and Ziegler in the United States.4.8 Review.References.5 The American Challenge.5.1 Hercules, Esso, Phillips, and Dart seek Advantages.5.1.1 Infringement Action Ziegler versus Phillips Petroleum.5.1.2 Hercules forces Ziegler into Legal Action against Dart.5.2 Between Dallas and New Orleans.5.3 Eastman Kodak.5.4 Max Fischer, Over and Over.5.5 Amoco, Arco and Novamomt launch New Attacks.5.6 18 Years of Feud with Dart.5.6.1 Determination of Liability.5.6.2 Decision Concerning the Amount of Damages.5.7 A Tentative Record of the "115 Patent".5.8 Lex Ziegler.5.9 Product Patent Protection for "Polypropylene."5.10 "High Speed" or "High Mileage" or "Ziegler Catalysts of the Second and Third Generation."5.11 Japanese Export of Automobiles to the United States.5.12 "The Last Chapter."5.13 Epilog.References.Index.
| Verlagsort | Weinheim |
|---|---|
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 240 x 170 mm |
| Gewicht | 573 g |
| Themenwelt | Naturwissenschaften ► Chemie |
| Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika | |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| ISBN-10 | 3-527-61040-5 / 3527610405 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-3-527-61040-2 / 9783527610402 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
aus dem Bereich
