Nicht aus der Schweiz? Besuchen Sie lehmanns.de

Tinnitus and Sound Sensitivity Casebook (eBook)

eBook Download: EPUB
2021 | 1. Auflage
160 Seiten
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
978-1-63853-684-0 (ISBN)

Lese- und Medienproben

Tinnitus and Sound Sensitivity Casebook -  Suzanne H. Kimball,  Marc Fagelson
Systemvoraussetzungen
69,99 inkl. MwSt
(CHF 68,35)
Der eBook-Verkauf erfolgt durch die Lehmanns Media GmbH (Berlin) zum Preis in Euro inkl. MwSt.
  • Download sofort lieferbar
  • Zahlungsarten anzeigen
<p><strong><em>Tinnitus and sound disorder case studies provide invaluable guidance on enhancing quality and scope of patient care</em></strong></p> <p>Tinnitus affects nearly one in 10 people around the world and tinnitus-related disabilities are considered among the most common chronic conditions reported. Historically, many patients with these conditions have been ignored, misunderstood, or misguided by medical, audiological, and/or online communities. <cite>Tinnitus and Sound Sensitivity Casebook</cite> by renowned audiologists and educators Suzanne H. Kimball and Marc Fagelson provides evidence-based strategies for clinical management of patients with tinnitus as well as sound intolerance disorders, based on a diverse array of case studies drawn from clinics.</p> <p>The book is divided into three sections and 29 chapters, with insightful clinical pearls from 24 multidisciplinary authors. The first section includes 15 cases on a full spectrum of underlying medical conditions, patterns of occurrence, and tinnitus with normal hearing, followed by two cases covering hyperacusis associated with an acoustic shock and diplacusis. Section two details psychological correlates for tinnitus and disorders of sound intolerance, with practical treatment strategies and coping skills for misophonia, fear hyperacusis, hyponatremia, pediatric cases, psychogenic tinnitus and dizziness, and PTSD. The final section, 'Additional Considerations,' includes two areas of practice currently growing in importance: patients with COVID who notice hearing changes and the co-occurrence of sound intolerance with normal pure-tone thresholds.</p> <p><strong>Key Highlights</strong></p> <ul> <li>Background, references, and examples of specific conditions and interventions support audiology's scope while providing options for the practitioner who works with an otherwise underserved patient population</li> <li>Each case study demonstrates the complexity of audiologic rehabilitation associated with tinnitus and disorders of sound tolerance, including challenging and unsuccessful outcomes</li> <li>Clinical history, test results, diagnosis, outcomes, questions, answers, items to support both patient and clinician self-efficacy, and key points enhance acquisition of knowledge, while encouraging problem-solving skills</li> </ul> <p>This is an important textbook for every graduate course in the area of clinical audiologic practice that addresses patient management related to tinnitus and sound tolerance. It is also a must-have reference for practicing clinicians to improve management and outcomes of patients with tinnitus, hyperacusis, and misophonia.</p> <p>This book includes complimentary access to a digital copy on <a href='https://medone.thieme.com/'>https://medone.thieme.com</a>.</p>

1 Internet-Based Tinnitus Intervention


Eldre Beukes

1.1 Clinical History/Description


Patient A attended his local tinnitus clinic due to distressing tinnitus. He had a mild hearing loss and was not using hearing aids. An initial tinnitus therapy session provided explanations about tinnitus and sleep hygiene. Practically arranging appointments was difficult as he was employed abroad and was not able to attend his local clinic frequently. The clinic suggested registering for a study looking at the effects of an Internet-based tinnitus intervention as this was prior to teleaudiology being frequently used. The patient registered and completed the screening questionnaire. This indicated that he was aged between 40 and 50 years. He had experienced tinnitus constantly for 2 years in both ears. The tinnitus was described as a complex presentation of ringing, buzzing, low and high pitched sounds, pulsating, clicking, music, voices, and humming. He attributed his tinnitus to long periods of exposure to noise without adequate hearing protection. He described being generally grumpy and irritable as a result of the tinnitus. Specific difficulties included trouble getting to sleep, concentrating, and hearing on his mobile phone and the television. Loud noises were annoying and aggravated the tinnitus. Hyperacusis together with tinnitus resulted in him being unable to do the things he previously enjoyed. Although he was struggling to hear, he did not want hearing aids. He explained that he hated anything in his ears.

Both the Tinnitus Functional Index1 and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory2 were administered and indicated a moderate impact of tinnitus with scores of 44/100 and 48/100, respectively. Mild levels of anxiety and depression were identified (8/21 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire3; 5/28 on the Patient Health Questionnaire4). The Insomnia Severity Index5 showed subthreshold insomnia at 10/28. There was mild hearing concerns (14/40 on the Hearing Handicap Inventory6). Strong hyperacusis was present (28/40 on the Hyperacusis Questionnaire7).

1.2 Questions for the Reader


1.With this level of tinnitus severity, should an Internet-based intervention be considered?

2.By what means should we be evaluating the presence of comorbid conditions for individuals with tinnitus?

3.Beyond those relating to co-occurring conditions, which outcome domains should we be assessing?

4.Which outcome measures should be used to assess intervention-related changes in tinnitus severity?

5.Which other specific outcome measures should we consider for those with tinnitus?

1.3 Discussion of Questions


1.With this level of tinnitus severity, should an Internet-based intervention be considered?
Internet-based interventions have predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Generally, a minimum cut-off score for inclusion ensures that participants have the potential to observe benefit from the study intervention; no maximum cut-off score was specified. Internet intervention studies tend to exclude people who have other serious additional health or mental health problems or those who are undertaking additional interventions. A complex range of factors contribute to a successful outcome; however, the factors may not be clear before commencing the intervention. The patient in this case had difficulty attending his local clinic and although he met all inclusionary criteria, he presented with mild levels of anxiety and depression. Such patients require careful monitoring to ensure their ability to complete the intervention, and to determine whether any additional services are required.

2.By what means should we be evaluating the presence of comorbid conditions?
Good justification is required for each assessment measure administered. In an Internet-based intervention there is a greater possibility of not detecting problems as there is no face-to-face interaction with the patient. Although a thorough investigation of symptoms is required, there is also a fine balance between a thorough case history and overloading the patient. If many assessment measures are required, then their selection should consider the effort and fatigue of the patient completing the forms. Very high levels of anxiety and depression should be identified and may need attending to before the patient is able to focus on addressing the tinnitus (see Table 1.2 for examples of intake forms).

Table 1.3 Comments about the intervention undertaken

Questions asked Comments
What was the best aspect of your treatment? Having a structure and positive feedback and advice from the personal messages. It helped me understand and enabled me to adjust and accept the tinnitus and be more relaxed about it
How has it helped? Thank you for your support throughout, it has helped tremendously and I have such a better understanding, feeling and approach to my tinnitus, these last few weeks it has reduced enormously, with minor flare-ups. I successfully attended to Pantos this year and my tinnitus did not prevent me from having a wonderful time. The stress and relaxing techniques have been wonderful and these will remain part of my daily and weekly routine wherever I may be in the world. The program has helped me relax and reflect differently on tinnitus. I now feel I can cope a lot better with tinnitus
Which modules were the most helpful? I have found the relaxation technique program very informative and some elements I felt I have really benefited from. Shifting Focus was a hard concept and this I did not get on well with. Whereas positive imagery and the relaxation steps provided me with excellent results. To the extent that I have had a few weeks where my tinnitus has virtually been non-existent. Trying to look at negative thoughts from a different angle has also helped. In general the more relaxed less stressful I am the less my tinnitus flares up
What will you continue using? I will keep the techniques going as I have seen the benefit of them. I have found over the last month that by trying to keep less stressed has had a huge impact on my tinnitus. I will continue to incorporate all the relaxation techniques, from the deep to the rapid, into my everyday life. By making situations less stressful then it’s easier to cope and makes one feel in a better place. Sleep hygiene and routine is a real benefit although extremely difficult when working away, but this is where the rapid techniques help, just before and after a meal. With deeper techniques at bedtimes. I have learned to break my worries down. This makes it much more manageable and achievable, that way I still feel in control and this helps me manage my tinnitus

3.Beyond those relating to co-occurring conditions, which outcome domains should we be assessing?
This is an important question. There are many possibilities. Some research has looked at specific outcomes that tinnitus patients find are most relevant to them. A Delphi study indicated domains such as concentration, quality of sleep, sense of control, mood, negative thoughts are important to stakeholders.8 Ideally, a core set of domains assessed across clinics would be ideal. Further work is required to establish the most appropriate and psychometrically robust measures for a tinnitus population. In view of these limitations, work is currently underway to identify a core set of outcome measures for tinnitus.9,​10

4.Which outcome measures should be used to assess intervention-related changes in tinnitus severity?
Both the TFI and THI were used here for comparative purposes. The measures selected should address various factors such as the purpose of testing (diagnostics/responsiveness to treatment). It is also important to consider whether the questionnaire is validated psychometrically for the population being tested. The TFI was specifically designed and validated to assess responsiveness to treatment, where many other tinnitus measures were designed for diagnostic purposes only.

5.Which other specific outcome measures should we consider for those with tinnitus?
Table 1.2 lists some suggestions. These are not the only options. The considerations mentioned above apply to selecting other questionnaires as well. These have generally been considered as secondary outcome measures. Thus short outcome measures may be preferred.

1.4 Final Diagnosis and Recommended Treatmen


The patient was randomized to receive 8 weeks of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) principles for tinnitus. This intervention consisted of the following key elements11,​12:

The intervention was provided on a purpose-built secure web-based platform. It had the required security features in place for data protection.

The content was based on CBT principles as these presently have the most robust evidence of effectiveness in minimizing the effects of tinnitus, particularly longer-term.13 Audiological principles formed from clinical experience and research found to be effective for tinnitus also informed the theoretical base of the intervention.

The content was divided into different modules. Two to three modules were...

Erscheint lt. Verlag 17.11.2021
Sprache englisch
Themenwelt Medizin / Pharmazie Gesundheitsfachberufe Logopädie
Medizin / Pharmazie Medizinische Fachgebiete HNO-Heilkunde
Schlagworte acoustic shock disoder • acoustic shock disorder • audiogenic seizure • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy • desensitization • disorders of sound tolerance • Hyperacusis • Medical disorders • misophonia • psychological management • PTSD • pulsatile • with normal hearing
ISBN-10 1-63853-684-8 / 1638536848
ISBN-13 978-1-63853-684-0 / 9781638536840
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
EPUBEPUB (Wasserzeichen)
Größe: 5,6 MB

DRM: Digitales Wasserzeichen
Dieses eBook enthält ein digitales Wasser­zeichen und ist damit für Sie persona­lisiert. Bei einer missbräuch­lichen Weiter­gabe des eBooks an Dritte ist eine Rück­ver­folgung an die Quelle möglich.

Dateiformat: EPUB (Electronic Publication)
EPUB ist ein offener Standard für eBooks und eignet sich besonders zur Darstellung von Belle­tristik und Sach­büchern. Der Fließ­text wird dynamisch an die Display- und Schrift­größe ange­passt. Auch für mobile Lese­geräte ist EPUB daher gut geeignet.

Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen dafür die kostenlose Software Adobe Digital Editions.
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen dafür eine kostenlose App.
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise

Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.

Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
ICF-orientierte Diagnostik und Therapie

von Barbara Schneider; Meike Wehmeyer; Holger Grötzbach

eBook Download (2021)
Springer-Verlag
CHF 38,95