Intentionality Deconstructed

An Anti-Realist Theory

Amir Horowitz (Autor)

Buch | Hardcover

224 Seiten

2024
Oxford University Press (Verlag)
978-0-19-889643-2 (ISBN)

Artikel merken

Intentionality Deconstructed argues for the view that no concrete entity - mental, linguistic, or any other - can possess intentional content. Nothing can be about anything. The concept of intentionality is flawed, and so content ascriptions cannot be "absolutely" true or false - they lack truth conditions. Nonetheless, content ascriptions have truth conditions and can be true (or possess a related epistemic merit) relative to practices of content ascription, so that different practices may imply different (not real but practice-dependent) intentional objects for the same token mental state. The suggested view does not deny the existence of those mental states standardly considered intentional, notably the so-called propositional attitudes; it affirms it. That is, support is provided for the existence of those states with the properties usually attributed to them, but absent intentional properties. Specifically, it is argued that the so-called propositional attitudes possess logico-syntactic properties, whose postulation plays an important role in addressing the challenge of reconciling intentional anti-realism with beliefs being true or having alternative epistemic merits, the argument from the predictive and explanatory success of content ascription for intentional realism, and the cognitive suicide objection to views that deny intentionality. As part of the rejection of this final objection, intentional anti-realism is presented as a radical view, which claims "Nothing can possess intentional content" but not that nothing can possess intentional content, and it is argued that this is a legitimate characteristic of radical philosophy. In spite of rejecting the "claim that" talk, intentional anti-realism gives clear sense to its dispute with its rivals as well as to its own superiority. Various arguments for intentional anti-realism are presented. One argument rejects all possible accounts of intentionality, namely primitivism, intrinsic reductionism - the prominent example of which is the phenomenal intentionality thesis - and extrinsic reductionism (that is, reductive naturalistic accounts). According to another argument, since intentional properties are shown to be dispensable for all possibly relevant purposes, and no sound arguments support the claim that they ever are instantiated, the application of Ockham's razor shows that no such properties ever are instantiated, and another step shows that neither can they be.

Professor Amir Horowitz is the head of the philosophy program and the PPE program of the Open University of Israel. His main areas of research are philosophy of mind and cognitive science and philosophy of language. He also studies issues in ethics, epistemology, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of sport.

Preface
1: Introducing Intentionality
2: How to Settle Issues of Intentionality, and a Tentative Argument for Intentional Anti-Realism
3: Against Phenomenal Intentionality as Intrinsic Reductive Intentionality
4: Against Naturalistic Reductions of Intentionality
5: Intentional Anti-Realism I
6: Intentional anti-realism II: Objections and Further Developments
References

Erscheinungsdatum	16.05.2024
Verlagsort	Oxford
Sprache	englisch
Maße	160 x 240 mm
Gewicht	504 g
Themenwelt	Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Sprachphilosophie
	Geisteswissenschaften ► Psychologie ► Allgemeine Psychologie
	Geisteswissenschaften ► Psychologie ► Verhaltenstherapie
ISBN-10	0-19-889643-3 / 0198896433
ISBN-13	978-0-19-889643-2 / 9780198896432
Zustand	Neuware