Nicht aus der Schweiz? Besuchen Sie lehmanns.de
Für diesen Artikel ist leider kein Bild verfügbar.

Anselm’s Other Argument

(Autor)

Buch | Hardcover
256 Seiten
2014
Harvard University Press (Verlag)
978-0-674-72504-1 (ISBN)
CHF 94,20 inkl. MwSt
  • Versand in 10-15 Tagen
  • Versandkostenfrei
  • Auch auf Rechnung
  • Artikel merken
Some commentators claim that Anselm’s writings contain a second independent “modal ontological argument” for God’s existence. A. D. Smith contends that although there is a second a priori argument in Anselm, it is not the modal argument. This “other argument” bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.
Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the “ontological argument” for God’s existence, famously arguing that “something than which nothing greater can be conceived,” which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a “modal ontological argument” that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God’s existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first.

Anselm’s Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This “other argument” bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.

A. D. Smith was Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick.

Erscheint lt. Verlag 7.1.2021
Zusatzinfo 4 diagrams
Verlagsort Cambridge, Mass
Sprache englisch
Maße 156 x 235 mm
Themenwelt Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Philosophie des Mittelalters
Geisteswissenschaften Religion / Theologie
ISBN-10 0-674-72504-2 / 0674725042
ISBN-13 978-0-674-72504-1 / 9780674725041
Zustand Neuware
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
von der menschlichen Wahl

von Thomas von Aquin; Andreas Speer

Buch | Softcover (2024)
Phillip Reclam (Verlag)
CHF 10,35