Nicht aus der Schweiz? Besuchen Sie lehmanns.de

The Story of the Big Four Railway Companies (eBook)

eBook Download: EPUB
2022 | 1. Auflage
256 Seiten
The History Press (Verlag)
978-1-80399-229-7 (ISBN)

Lese- und Medienproben

The Story of the Big Four Railway Companies -  Colin G. Maggs
Systemvoraussetzungen
13,99 inkl. MwSt
(CHF 13,65)
Der eBook-Verkauf erfolgt durch die Lehmanns Media GmbH (Berlin) zum Preis in Euro inkl. MwSt.
  • Download sofort lieferbar
  • Zahlungsarten anzeigen
GWR, LMS, LNER and SR: these initials arouse memories of the Cornish Riviera Express, the streamlined Coronation Scot, the streamlined Coronation with its beaver tail, and the Southern Electrics, yet three of these companies only enjoyed a life of 25 years. Colin G. Maggs, one of the country's leading railway historians, tells the story of how these Big Four companies came into being and their enormous success following the rundown of the railways during the First World War. The remarkable, if surprisingly brief, era of the Big Four saw great changes and achievements, including streamlining, speed records, electrification, diesel power, railway-owned buses and aircraft, and a real sense of cooperation between companies. The Story of the Big Four Railway Companies is a memorable illustrated history of their reign.

COLIN G. MAGS has had 105 books published to date, mostly on railway history. In 1993 HM the Queen awarded him an MBE for services to railway history. He has written countless railway newspaper and magazine articles, given broadcasts on TV and radio, talks to societies, and lectured on railway history at the University of Bath. He lives in Bath.

2


RAILWAY GROUPING


Thus 7 years of government control had reduced the railway companies from being relatively prosperous commercial undertakings to a precarious financial position, for although Parliament had established the principle that increases in wage costs should be met by increased charges by the passing of the Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1913, no steps had been taken by the government until January 1920 to increase rates and charges with a view to enabling the undertakings to be worked at a profit. Government representatives had declined to respond to the recommendation of the Railway Executive Committee that railway charges, in common with those in every other industry, should be advanced concurrently with increased costs of operation. The government gave an assurance that, in order to enable the companies to revert more gradually to pre-war conditions, the period of control with a guarantee of net receipts would be extended for 2 years after the end of the war.

On 26 February 1919 the Ways and Communications Bill (afterwards the Ministry of Transport Act) was introduced into Parliament. On 17 March, Sir E. Geddes in moving the second reading of the measure, explained that the government:

… has come to the conclusion that some measure of unified control of all systems of transportation is necessary – that there must be some body who can be asked what the transportation policy of a country is, and whose responsibility it is to have a policy. It is only the State, only the Government, that can centrally take that position.

It should be noted that the railway companies were not consulted on the framing of this bill, or notified of its intended provisions, before it was presented to the House of Commons. The bill provided for the appointment of a Minister of Transport to whom was to be transferred the powers and duties of the various government departments in relation to railways, tramways, canals, roads, harbours and docks. The control of the railways hitherto exercised by the Board of Trade was transferred to the Ministry of Transport. The period of state control of the railways, with a continuance of the guarantee of net receipts, was extended for 2 years from 15 August 1919, the date of the Act, ‘with a view to affording time for the consideration and formulation of the policy to be pursued as to the future position of the undertakings’.

The bill was read a second time on 18 March and a third time on 11 July, 245 voting for the third reading and none against. Royal Assent was given on 15 August 1919, the Act to be cited as the Ministry of Transport Act, 1919. The Railway Advisory Committee, which had succeeded the REC of the war period, was in association with the ministry.

In deciding what the government policy as to the future of the railways was to be, the Minister of Transport was faced with three alternatives:

1 To hand back the railways to their owners, weighed down with all the burdens which had accrued during the years of war and the extended period of control.

2 To unify the railway completely or partially under private ownership, with adjustments calculated to restore their dividend-earning power.

3 To nationalise the railways.

In June 1920 the government issued a White Paper (Command 787) containing an outline of its proposals and indicating that the government had chosen to adopt the second alternative. The suggestions put forward were exhaustively considered by all interests affected, and months of negotiations and discussions took place between the parties concerned – the government, representatives of the railway companies, railways users and railway employees. The result of these discussions was that on a number of points common ground was reached, but at the time of the introduction of the Railways Bill, 11 May 1921, there were still a number of important questions in regard to which there was a diversity of view.

In 1921 the initial thinking was in favour of having four English railways: the Great Western Railway annexing those in Wales; a Southern group; a combined North Western and Midland serving the west coast; and another group serving the east coast. Scotland would have two lines: the East Scottish made up of the North British and Great North of Scotland companies; and the West Scottish, composed of the Caledonian and the Glasgow & South Western.

Negotiations continued following the introduction of the measure and in its main details the Railways Act, 1921, found its place on the Statute Book agreed to and generally approved by those interests concerned in its successful operation.

The Act contained five main sets of provisions:

1 For the grouping of railways.

2 For disposing the claims of the railway companies against the state arising out of the wartime agreements.

3 Governing the future charging powers of the railway companies.

4 Machinery for dealing with questions relating to rates of pay and conditions of service of employees.

5 Regulation of railways.

During 1922 the Great Western acquired the Welsh companies by amalgamation, followed by the Didcot, Newbury & Southampton in the summer of 1923 and the Midland & South Western Junction on 28 September 1923. As the Great Western was easily the largest company in the western group, feeling ran high in Wales and, as a concession to local sentiment, the six local railways were eventually classified ‘constituent’ rather than ‘subsidiary’.

Grouping involved the disappearance of old and familiar names, as famous undertakings, some almost a century old, lost their identity in enlarged concerns. A total of 120 independent railways were merged into four large companies: the Great Western Railway (GWR); London, Midland and Scottish (LMS); London and North Eastern Railways (LNER); and Southern Railways (SR). In general, the larger railway companies were amalgamated while the smaller companies were absorbed (see Appendix 1). Alone of the great companies, the GWR retained the name borne since its incorporation in 1835. This was secured by a special provision in the Act which constituted the Great Western the amalgamated company for the western group.

The three major joint lines – the Cheshire Lines Committee, the Midland & Great Northern, and the Somerset & Dorset – continued as separate undertakings.

The amalgamation of railways was generally recognised as right in principle, in accordance with the history of railways which had been one of amalgamation. In total approximately 1,000 railways had been promoted in Great Britain, but by the process of amalgamation and absorption these had been reduced to about 200 at the time of the passing of the Railways Act.

In December 1923 the route mileage was 20,294 miles. Capital expenditure stood at £1,181,200,000. In round figures, total traffic receipts for 1923 were £205,900,000; of this £94,100,000 was contributed by coaching. Expenditure for the year was £166,100,000. Other items on the 1923 return were those given in Appendix 3, plus:

Private owners’ wagons

628,344

Motor buses

187

Horse buses

72

Parcels and goods motor vehicles

2,099

Horse wagons and carts

32,641

Passenger journeys:

 

First class

21,463,000

Second class

4,046,000

Third class

897,961,000

Workmen’s

310,273,000

Total

1,233,743,000

Season tickets:

 

First class

133,000

Second class

74,000

Third class

687,000

Total

894,000

General merchandise (tons)

58,773,000

Coal, coke and patent fuel

222,239,000

Other minerals (tons)

61,983,000

Total (tons)

342,995,000

Livestock

17,266,000

Train miles:

 

Coaching

251,669,000

Freight

143,114,000

Shunting coaching

16,980,000

Shunting freight

109,561,000

Engine miles

52,328,000

Total

590,918,000

Although many branches of railway service were dangerous, one great advantage of railway work was its permanent character. The mechanics employed at the companies’ manufacturing and repair shops had to face the uncertainty of this class of work, but even there the activity was more regular than in...

Erscheint lt. Verlag 10.11.2022
Verlagsort London
Sprache englisch
Themenwelt Natur / Technik Fahrzeuge / Flugzeuge / Schiffe Schienenfahrzeuge
Geschichte Allgemeine Geschichte Neuzeit (bis 1918)
Geisteswissenschaften Psychologie
Schlagworte big 4 railway companies • big four railways companies • BR • British Railways • cornish reviera expres • coronation scot • diesel power • diesel trains • electrification • great western region • GWR • GWR photographs • GWR pictures • lms|LNER • LMS photographs • LMS pictures • LNER photographs • LNER pictures • london midland and scottish • london north eastern region • rail history • rail nationalisation • railway historian • railway owned buses • railway photographs • remembering steam • southern electrics • Southern Region • SR • SR photographs • SR pictures • steam photographs • train history • train photographs
ISBN-10 1-80399-229-8 / 1803992298
ISBN-13 978-1-80399-229-7 / 9781803992297
Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt?
EPUBEPUB (Wasserzeichen)
Größe: 7,7 MB

DRM: Digitales Wasserzeichen
Dieses eBook enthält ein digitales Wasser­zeichen und ist damit für Sie persona­lisiert. Bei einer missbräuch­lichen Weiter­gabe des eBooks an Dritte ist eine Rück­ver­folgung an die Quelle möglich.

Dateiformat: EPUB (Electronic Publication)
EPUB ist ein offener Standard für eBooks und eignet sich besonders zur Darstellung von Belle­tristik und Sach­büchern. Der Fließ­text wird dynamisch an die Display- und Schrift­größe ange­passt. Auch für mobile Lese­geräte ist EPUB daher gut geeignet.

Systemvoraussetzungen:
PC/Mac: Mit einem PC oder Mac können Sie dieses eBook lesen. Sie benötigen dafür die kostenlose Software Adobe Digital Editions.
eReader: Dieses eBook kann mit (fast) allen eBook-Readern gelesen werden. Mit dem amazon-Kindle ist es aber nicht kompatibel.
Smartphone/Tablet: Egal ob Apple oder Android, dieses eBook können Sie lesen. Sie benötigen dafür eine kostenlose App.
Geräteliste und zusätzliche Hinweise

Buying eBooks from abroad
For tax law reasons we can sell eBooks just within Germany and Switzerland. Regrettably we cannot fulfill eBook-orders from other countries.

Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
Eine Eisenbahn-Traumreise durch die alpine Schweiz

von Michael Dörflinger

eBook Download (2023)
GeraMond Verlag
CHF 19,50
100 Jahre elektrischer Betrieb

von Karsten Risch

eBook Download (2024)
GeraMond Verlag
CHF 27,35